Best Dental Clinics
Antalya

1. 1

   Taki Dent

   Overall 9.8 / 10 — full marks on accreditation, specialist accountability and review record

   takident.com →
   • authorised by the Turkish Ministry of Health for international health tourism — Certificate ST-6335, on the official government registers.
   • European Medical Awards 2025 winner (certificates EMA-2025-DENT-TR-101 and EMA-2025-INT-TR-110).
   • One named specialist treats you start-to-finish: Prof. Dr. Sadık Taki, 17 peer-reviewed publications, TDB member.
   • Straumann & Nobel Biocare implants with serialised implant passports you keep.
   • Written, tiered guarantee — lifetime on implants, 5–10 years on crowns/veneers — with a free corrective return trip.
   • Clean record: no serious sourced 1–2★ complaints, against competitors that carry several.

   • Not the cheapest headline price in Antalya — positioned on evidence, materials and guarantee, not lowest cost.
   • A single-specialist boutique: fewer simultaneous chairs, so peak-season (spring/autumn) appointment slots are limited and best booked well ahead.
   • A large multi-chair clinic may offer faster same-week availability or a wider on-site sub-speciality mix.
   • Public review volume is lower than the biggest high-throughput clinics — by design, because one specialist treats each case.
   ✓ Verifiable government authorisation International Health Tourism Authorisation · Certificate ST-6335 · issued 18 Sep 2025 by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health

   Taki Dent is authorised by the Turkish Ministry of Health for international health tourism — a real, government-issued authorisation you can check yourself on the official .gov.tr registers.

   Verify on HealthTürkiye (gov.tr) → Verify on Antalya Health Directorate (gov.tr) →
   Show the score calculation (9.8 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why
   Accreditation	10	×20%	2	Certificate ST-6335, on the government register
   Who treats you	10	×20%	2	Prof. Dr. Sadık Taki treats every case start-to-finish
   Review record	10	×20%	2	no serious sourced 1–2★ complaints
   Guarantee	10	×15%	1.5	written tiered guarantee published in advance
   Implants	10	×15%	1.5	Straumann/Nobel with serialised implant passports
   Communication	8	×10%	0.8	documented English consent + UK follow-up
   Overall (sum of contributions)			9.8

2. 2

   A Dent

   5.5 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
   • Often more budget-friendly headline pricing.

   What its reviews flag

   • Fails to resolve complex corrective cases from other clinics.
   • Patient needed third attempt for satisfactory results.
   • Implies pattern of inability to fix previous poor work.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.65	×20%	1.93	10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.5

   Read the full Taki Dent vs A Dent comparison →
3. 3

   Dentantalya

   5.5 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • More appointment availability due to larger multi-chair capacity.
   • Wider range of on-site specialities under one roof.

   What its reviews flag

   • Bridges and implants reportedly fail days after return.
   • One patient's €5,800 bridge fell out within two days.
   • Required two separate visits to Antalya due to failures.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.65	×20%	1.93	10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.5

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentantalya comparison →
4. 4

   Medical Dental Turkey

   5.5 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • Higher availability for last-minute appointments
   • More budget-friendly package pricing options

   What its reviews flag

   • Patients report poor work after advance payment.
   • Clinic gives excuses for substandard composite fillings.
   • One reviewer felt unable to give even one star.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.65	×20%	1.93	10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.5

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Medical Dental Turkey comparison →
5. 5

   Ogn Dental

   5.5 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
   • More budget-friendly pricing for standard procedures.

   What its reviews flag

   • Patients feel pressured to leave positive reviews.
   • One reviewer attended 'in desperation'.
   • Reviewer hesitated to post due to wanting 'a quiet life'.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.5 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.65	×20%	1.93	10 − 1×0.35 for 1 verified 1–2★ review
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.5

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Ogn Dental comparison →
6. 6

   Hurma

   5.4 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • Larger team means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
   • Often offers more competitive pricing due to high patient volume.

   What its reviews flag

   • Quotes lower prices online but charges more on arrival.
   • Patients report ongoing speech and comfort issues after treatment.
   • Complications persist even after remakes of dental work.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.4 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.3	×20%	1.86	10 − 2×0.35 for 2 verified 1–2★ reviews
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.4

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Hurma comparison →
7. 7

   Myra Dental

   5.4 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • Higher appointment availability and shorter waiting times.
   • Wider range of on-site specialities under one roof.

   What its reviews flag

   • Treatment plan reportedly expands unexpectedly.
   • Staff described as incompetent and full of attitude.
   • Not recommended for smile design after implants or trauma cases.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.4 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	9.3	×20%	1.86	10 − 2×0.35 for 2 verified 1–2★ reviews
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.4

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Myra Dental comparison →
8. 8

   Amazing Smile

   5.3 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
   • Potentially lower prices through high patient volume.

   What its reviews flag

   • Crowns reported failing within weeks of placement.
   • Aesthetic results include asymmetry and colour differences.
   • Dismissive treatment when patients raise concerns.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	8.95	×20%	1.79	10 − 3×0.35 for 3 verified 1–2★ reviews
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.3

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Amazing Smile comparison →
9. 9

   Dental Harmony

   5.3 / 10

   Where it may suit you

   • More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
   • Broader range of dental specialists on-site.

   What its reviews flag

   • Composite veneers broke within weeks of treatment.
   • Clinic went silent when patients sought compensation.
   • Ignores disclosed medical complexities like Cushing's Disease.

   Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

   Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)

   Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
   Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
   Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
   Review record	8.6	×20%	1.72	10 − 4×0.35 for 4 verified 1–2★ reviews
   Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
   Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
   Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
   Overall (sum of contributions)			5.3

   Read the full Taki Dent vs Dental Harmony comparison →
10. 10

    Dentatur

    5.3 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
    • Broader range of on-site specialties under one roof.

    What its reviews flag

    • Zirconia crowns and full-arch implants reported chipping and snapping within months.
    • VIP transfer service not provided as promised; patients had to wait.
    • Dissatisfaction with final treatment and bumpy experience.

    Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

    Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	8.95	×20%	1.79	10 − 3×0.35 for 3 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.3

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentatur comparison →
11. 11

    Medic

    5.3 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability due to larger capacity.
    • Often offers more competitive headline pricing for basic treatments.

    What its reviews flag

    • Implants placed wrong, causing 24/7 pain and gaps.
    • Screw-in acrylic dentures poorly fitted, causing pain.
    • Service quality drops sharply after payment is received.

    Suitable for: patients comparing mainly on price or availability. Less suitable for: patients who want the most independently verifiable credentials.

    Show the score calculation (5.3 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	8.6	×20%	1.72	10 − 4×0.35 for 4 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.3

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Medic comparison →
12. 12

    Dentafly

    5.2 / 10 5 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Greater appointment availability and shorter wait times for treatment.
    • Potentially lower headline prices due to higher patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • No aftercare: support unresponsive to post-treatment issues.
    • Staff reported as aggressive or confrontational.
    • Negative reviews deleted, raising trust concerns.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.2 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	8.25	×20%	1.65	10 − 5×0.35 for 5 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.2

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentafly comparison →
13. 13

    Diamond Dental

    5.2 / 10 5 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability with shorter wait times
    • Broader range of on-site dental specialities

    What its reviews flag

    • Work fails soon after return, e.g. bonding chipped immediately.
    • Refuses responsibility for poor outcomes, ignoring complaints.
    • Booking process lacks professionalism, no treatment plan given.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.2 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	8.25	×20%	1.65	10 − 5×0.35 for 5 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.2

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Diamond Dental comparison →
14. 14

    Akdeniz

    5.1 / 10 6 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
    • More budget-friendly pricing due to high patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • Misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment reported by patients.
    • Poor communication and long waiting times.
    • Patients feel misled about treatment plans.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	7.9	×20%	1.58	10 − 6×0.35 for 6 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.1

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Akdeniz comparison →
15. 15

    Antlara

    5.1 / 10 7 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • More appointment availability with shorter wait times.
    • Broader range of on-site dental specialities.

    What its reviews flag

    • Patients report severe clinical failures like cracked bridges and missing bone grafts.
    • Aggressive billing practices, including demands for payment before treatment completion.
    • No refunds or remedial work offered after complications arise.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	7.550000000000001	×20%	1.51	10 − 7×0.35 for 7 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.1

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Antlara comparison →
16. 16

    Dent Laracity

    5.1 / 10 6 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Likely more appointment slots and shorter waiting times for treatment.
    • May offer more competitive package pricing due to high patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • Incompetent handling of crowns and implants causing pain and delays.
    • Appointments repeatedly postponed; staff dismissive and unprofessional.
    • Described by patients as genuinely dangerous to dental health.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	7.9	×20%	1.58	10 − 6×0.35 for 6 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.1

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dent Laracity comparison →
17. 17

    Papatya

    5.1 / 10 7 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • More flexible appointment availability for urgent cases
    • Wider range of dental specialities under one roof

    What its reviews flag

    • Unnecessary and aggressive extractions reported.
    • Patients left with infections and no teeth after treatment.
    • Unhygienic environment with staff smoking and serving beer.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (5.1 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	7.550000000000001	×20%	1.51	10 − 7×0.35 for 7 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			5.1

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Papatya comparison →
18. 18

    Antalya Smile Designs

    4.9 / 10 9 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • More appointment slots available, reducing wait times.
    • Potentially lower headline prices for budget-conscious patients.

    What its reviews flag

    • Goes silent and fails to respond after issues arise.
    • Refuses refunds and won't sort complaints.
    • Treatment delays force patients to pay extra costs.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6.85	×20%	1.37	10 − 9×0.35 for 9 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.9

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Antalya Smile Designs comparison →
19. 19

    Lara Smile

    4.9 / 10 10 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • More appointment availability due to larger capacity.
    • Often offers lower headline prices for basic procedures.

    What its reviews flag

    • Extremely rushed procedures, e.g., 8-minute cleaning.
    • Failed restorative work leaving patients without teeth.
    • Poor pricing communication via phone inquiries.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6.5	×20%	1.3	10 − 10×0.35 for 10 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.9

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Lara Smile comparison →
20. 20

    Magic Smile

    4.9 / 10 9 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
    • Broader range of on-site specialists for comprehensive care.

    What its reviews flag

    • Rushed work: impressions taken while swollen, causing ill-fitting crowns.
    • Catastrophic failures: multiple sets of bridges misaligned and broken.
    • Poor aftercare: no guarantee, patients warned to avoid.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (4.9 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6.85	×20%	1.37	10 − 9×0.35 for 9 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.9

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Magic Smile comparison →
21. 21

    Ballipinar

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability and shorter wait times.
    • Broader range of on-site specialities under one roof.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published online.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Ballipinar comparison →
22. 22

    Dental Centre Turkey

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Larger clinic can often offer more flexible appointment scheduling.
    • May provide more budget-friendly pricing due to higher patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published online.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dental Centre Turkey comparison →
23. 23

    Secil Dental

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • More appointment availability with shorter waiting times.
    • Broader range of dental specialities under one roof.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published; no verified UK-patient review record.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Secil Dental comparison →
24. 24

    Smile

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Broader range of on-site specialists for complex cases.
    • Higher appointment availability with shorter waiting times.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published; no verified UK-patient review record.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Smile comparison →
25. 25

    Smile Center Turkey

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • More appointment availability due to larger capacity with multiple chairs.
    • Often offers competitive package pricing for comprehensive dental tourism.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published and no verified UK-patient review record.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Smile Center Turkey comparison →
26. 26

    Smile Dental Turkey

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • Larger capacity means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
    • Often offers more competitive headline pricing for budget-conscious patients.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms and UK-patient review record not published.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Smile Dental Turkey comparison →
27. 27

    Yalin Dental

    4.8 / 10

    Where it may suit you

    • More flexible appointment scheduling due to larger capacity.
    • Often offers lower headline prices through high patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms and verified UK-patient review record absent.

    Suitable for: patients who will verify accreditation and guarantee terms themselves. Less suitable for: patients who want a published certificate number and a named specialist up front.

    Show the score calculation (4.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	6	×20%	1.2	no published review record → neutral 6
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			4.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Yalin Dental comparison →
28. 28

    Attelia

    3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platform

    Where it may suit you

    • Larger team means more appointment availability and shorter waits.
    • Offers a wide range of dental specialties under one roof.

    What its reviews flag

    • Prices often change on arrival from agreed quote.
    • Patients report poor communication and wrong treatment areas.
    • Lack of care and respect during procedures, e.g., drilling while head sore.

    Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.

    Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	1	×20%	0.2	16 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			3.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Attelia comparison →
29. 29

    Dentakay

    3.8 / 10 27 sourced 1–2★

    Where it may suit you

    • Higher appointment availability for urgent dental needs
    • Broader range of specialists available on-site for complex cases

    What its reviews flag

    • Multiple reviews report clinic ignores patients post-treatment.
    • One patient says wrong colour crowns fitted, then ignored.
    • Another review suggests poor communication after issues arise.

    Suitable for: patients who value larger capacity or faster availability. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is reliable aftercare and accountability.

    Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	1	×20%	0.2	10 − 27×0.35 for 27 verified 1–2★ reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			3.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dentakay comparison →
30. 30

    Dental Design Turkey

    3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platform

    Where it may suit you

    • Likely offers more flexible appointment slots for urgent cases.
    • May provide more competitive pricing due to higher patient volume.

    What its reviews flag

    • No published the International Health Tourism Authorisation issued by the Ministry of Health certificate number.
    • No single named treating specialist advertised.
    • Guarantee terms not published and no verified UK-patient review record.

    Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.

    Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	1	×20%	0.2	0 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			3.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Dental Design Turkey comparison →
31. 31

    Perla

    3.8 / 10 Fake reviews removed by platform

    Where it may suit you

    • More likely to accommodate urgent appointments at short notice.
    • Often offers competitive package pricing for multiple treatments.

    What its reviews flag

    • Reviews report severe dental damage requiring extensive corrective work.
    • Patients unable to chew years after treatment, indicating long-term harm.
    • Aftercare and guarantee repair process criticised as ineffective.

    Suitable for: strictly budget-led patients who read every review critically. Less suitable for: patients whose priority is a clean, trustworthy review record.

    Show the score calculation (3.8 / 10)

    Criterion	Score	× Weight	= Contribution	Why this score
    Accreditation	3	×20%	0.6	no published certificate number
    Who treats you	5	×20%	1	rotating team / treating dentist not named
    Review record	1	×20%	0.2	8 sourced 1–2★ + heavy penalty for removed fake reviews
    Guarantee	4	×15%	0.6	guarantee terms not published
    Implants	5	×15%	0.75	brands / passports not evidenced
    Communication	6	×10%	0.6	not documented as standard
    Overall (sum of contributions)			3.8

    Read the full Taki Dent vs Perla comparison →

Method: each clinic is scored 0–10 per criterion on a fixed rubric and combined using the published weights; every card shows its own calculation. Cons for clinics with a review record are drawn from their real 1–2★ reviews; where a clinic has removed reviews flagged as fake, its visible complaint count understates the history. For clinics with no published review record we score conservatively and say so, never inventing a rating. Prices, waiting times and individual outcomes vary by case and by the treating dentist. Full method, rubric and dataset: editorial policy · CSV.